by Cactus Jack » Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:56 pm
T-Rod, you couldn't be any farther off base, my friend. I look at his Presidency from a journalist/historian point of view, with a degree in one and a lifelong love of the other. I have a pretty good idea where his presidency will be placed, and it will be down there with Harding, Hoover and some of the lesser lights of the 19th Century. He's made a complete mess of it, and anyone with any perspective can see it. He's taken this country in the wrong direction at every turn. You can't get it more wrong if you flipped a coin on every decision.
We had enormous good will after 9/11. Every country in the world outside of 2 or 3 Islamic extremist states were sad for us. Had we gone full force into Afghanistan and rooted out al Qaeda, the world would have applauded. We squandered it all.
We invaded a sovereign nation on false evidence and turned it into the most violent place on the planet. Before it's over, more Iraqis will be dead than Saddam Hussein murdered in his entire rein of terror.
We have no credibility anywhere. We have no friends. We have nothing to bargain with, other than our seemingly reckless will to go someplace and fight.
Our middle-class has been decimated.
Our rights have been trampled upon.
And he's "staying the course" with Cheney and Rumsfeld, even when his own party would be happier if they were gone. Our military is so thin we can't reinforce Iraq. We're trillions of dollars in debt. Everyone is afraid of what's coming next. Consumer confidence is lower than whale-droppings. And nobody knows what to do next.
Yeah, I guess he'd rank right up there with those sterling Presidents I stated. Hell, he's even worse than Jimmy Carter, and I never ever thought I'd live to see that!
Bush would have to improve to be ineffective.
iceman, all I can say is DAMN!
"Are the players better as the stakes go up? It's not an exam; it's a buyin." Barry Tanenbaum