Global Warming: Weather Extremes

by **black_knight6** » Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:00 pm

I dunno, but here's the kicker...it's a WAY bigger footprint to go the biofuels route because the windfarm required to power the equivalent number of cars that a corn farm is WAY SMALLER...biofuels are far less efficient than wind.

So, the 'cost' would be negative: it would be BETTER to go wind, than farming.

by **Nortonesque** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:35 am

by **antneye** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:32 am

by **Johnny Hughes** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:48 am

by **Johnny Hughes** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:00 am

by **black_knight6** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:48 am

by **Proplayer44** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:18 am

by **black_knight6** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:11 am

by **Stoneburg** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:35 am

by **Nortonesque** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:09 pm

by **black_knight6** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:22 pm

Lol...did you read what I wrote? Corn is the principal commodity used in producing biofuels! Instead of the huge corn fields being used for biofuel production, only a small fraction of them need be replaced by windmills...and guess what? You can farm AROUND them! There's no food shortage in the US, and there wouldn't become one since the 'corn' farms being replaced aren't being used for food anyway.

by **Nortonesque** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:47 pm

by **Stoneburg** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:23 pm

Global Warming: Weather Extremes

Who is online

Who is online