Advanced search

Sets out of position vs. raiser

Hand analysis. Post your trouble hands here

Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department

Sets out of position vs. raiser

Postby Aisthesis » Fri Oct 21, 2005 2:04 am

"Normally," I'm still pretty much always for betting into the raiser, whether with probe bet or closer to full pot.

But I do think there are also situations for the check-raise. Basically, I think the looser the raiser, the more inclined you should be to check-raise as long as they'll still make a continuation bet. Actually, if the raiser is to your immediate left and the pot is multi-way, this can get you a pretty decent pot if someone else hits.

Often, no one at the table respects this kind of raiser, so you may even get a call or a raise before it gets back to you.

So, essentially, I'm saying that if you expect the raiser to have very little but to make a continuation bet, then the check-raise is a good option.

For probe bets vs. close to full pot, I think you need to look at the board as well as the raiser and your own history of playing with this raiser. Basically, you want to get raised here, and I find that most raisers have trouble with that if you bet full pot into them.

One other note on the check-raise: You need a REALIABLE continuation bet. You really don't want it checked all the way around. It's not an absolute disaster with a set, since you have drawing chances on the river against anything but an overset. But you also haven't built any kind of pot if it gets checked all the way around.
User avatar
Aisthesis
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 am

Postby MHFlush » Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:30 am

I agree that one should 80% of the time lead into the raiser with a set. However, the other 20% I like to check-raise/call because of 'protecting your checks' and not to be too predictable. I have to convince the table that I can have a real hand when I check. Important for future protection. I would not check-raise against a tight opponent but against a loose one it is effective.

MHFlush
User avatar
MHFlush
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:55 am
Location: Germany

Postby T-Rod » Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:48 am

When I'm OOP with a flopped set, I've had some success playing:

Flop--Lead into the raiser with 1/2 pot sized bet. If he raises, call after taking some time to decide.

Turn--Check it unless the draw really makes you wonder about your hand (like did he just hit his set).

River--Check-Raise all-in. An overpair often thinks his cards are good and you are trying to steal the pot from him. They also don't put you on a set b/c wouldn't you have raised the turn? Also, future river steal attempts have more credibility and your check/calls on the river will probably be more definable (i.e, they are less likely to try to bluff you on the river).

A change of pace type play.
User avatar
T-Rod
 
Posts: 5794
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby AlamdeaMike » Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:58 am

I looked through all my pair hands searching for a hand where I got a set OOP and there was a preflop raiser. I found one.


FullTiltPoker Game #217631023: Table Westcliff - $0.25/$0.50 - No Limit Hold'em - 23:55:55 ET - 2005/09/13
Seat 1: AlamedaMike ($76.70)
Seat 3: Razorback3 ($43.70)
Seat 4: man_hands ($46.05)
Seat 5: Nickle-Ass ($36.75)
Seat 6: Zonker1972 ($19)
Seat 7: WhoozUrDaddy ($47.20)
Seat 8: cfeuer ($70.85)
Seat 9: CraigH98 ($29.55)
Zonker1972 posts the small blind of $0.25
WhoozUrDaddy posts the big blind of $0.50
The button is in seat #5
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to AlamedaMike [8s] [8c]
cfeuer folds
CraigH98 folds
AlamedaMike calls $0.50
Razorback3 folds
man_hands folds
Nickle-Ass raises to $2
Zonker1972 folds
WhoozUrDaddy calls $1.50
AlamedaMike calls $1.50

*** FLOP *** [6h] [2s] [8h]

WhoozUrDaddy checks, AlamedaMike bets $6.25, Nickle-Ass calls $6.25
WhoozUrDaddy folds

*** TURN *** [8d]

AlamedaMike bets $18.75, Nickle-Ass calls $18.75

*** RIVER *** [7d]

AlamedaMike bets $49.70, and is all in
Nickle-Ass calls $9.75, and is all in
Uncalled bet of $39.95 returned to AlamedaMike

*** SHOW DOWN ***
AlamedaMike shows [8s] [8c] (four of a kind, Eights)
Nickle-Ass mucks [Kh] [Kc]
AlamedaMike wins the pot ($72.75) with four of a kind, Eights
Nickle-Ass is sitting out
Don't lose your entire stack in an unraised pot or with only one pair.
User avatar
AlamdeaMike
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:32 pm
Location: Alameda, CA

Postby Rhound50 » Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:06 pm

The way I play a set changes a lot depending on a few circumstances. First off OOP in a multiway pot, I almost always check especially in a loose game. Let the Bettor bet out. If there are a couple of callers, I check raise if he bets it heads up, I just call and lead the turn about half pot and hope I get raised.

Heads up I like to lead into the raisor. Also if I am playing in a deep stack game I will almost always lead my sets because I need to build a big pot so, I can get all in. This is unless i am playing against a very agressive player that I think will pot commit himself. I have played live vs a bunch of player that love to overplay AA. raise to $30 preflop, then go all in for $200 more after the flop.
"Its a pink handbag not backpack damn it." Godlikeroy

"From playing full tilt I wanna smash every garden gnome I see. That travelocity commercial puts me on instant tilt."
User avatar
Rhound50
Semi Pro (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 7304
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:15 am
Location: La Jolla, Ca


Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests

cron