I have noticed that the new rules are rating very solid players as WT. There are a few things that need to be changed there I think. If I can recall correctly, the only number used to rate WT is the WtSD%, isnt it?. Thats not right.
Haha thanks, i posted my stats a few days ago and told i was playing far too weak/tight so i did a complete 180 and now i've totally changed that. I've found the variance to be MUCH higher, and i've actually lost money over the 2k or so hands i've played, but i find it to be a much better way of playing and most of my losses were bad beats when i was the favourite. This forum rocks
To be honest I have no idea if this extreme "raise or fold" strategy is more profitable than more ABC play... I'm mainly doing it as an experiment and because it's funny.
It makes sense though that it would both be profitable and make you a better player, since you remove the wimp option (ie: calling) and force yourself to make decisions. And since poker is all about making the right decisions...