by shoesnatcher » Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:17 am
Against a maniac to my right I usually won't risk being all in preflop with less than 10's or AK. Normally I try to avoid maniacs because in my experience they have hurt more than helped my bankroll. Here's why I think this:
1. The maniac is raising so much it makes it impossible to justify playing anything but the most premium of hands for me I would only play 10-A's and AK, so forget about making sets (your bread and butter at NL), seeing the flop with suited connectors, AQ, etc.
2. If you decide to take on the maniac with say 10-Q's you could well run into an opponent with aces or kings (if there are others to act after you and the maniac), or possible face calls from others who are 'reacting' to the maniac. With pocket pairs such as 10's,J's,Q's and AKo you really don't want multiway action.
Because maniacs cramp my style of play and put my stack at risk from opponents acting after me, I will normally allow other opponents to deal with the maniac. If the maniac becomes such a problem I can't play pairs, big overcards, etc and does not go broke after a while I just move on to another table. When it comes between my ego and my bankroll, the bankroll always wins.