by Cactus Jack » Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:34 pm
It is not surprising when a fish doesn't know something, but when experienced players don't, you have to be a little surprised.
A guy playing today in the Venetian freeroll didn't know what M was. He's not a tournament player, so it's understandable. But we just naturally assume people know what we know, esp when they are "better" players than we are.
I had a D-list poker celebrity in my limo a couple weeks ago who didn't understand the pot odds of drawing to a pair after the flop and would have called a bet in a hand that she would have been way, way behind and should be folding. By the time I got her out of the car, I was ready to drive into a bridge abutment. She knew absolutely NO theory, yet is playing blinds over my buyins, has a 400K bankroll , endorsements, and an ego the size of the Amazon room at the RIO. "I don't worry about math. I play the psychology." I can see that. She put me on driving tilt.
How some of these people can be "winning" while knowing virtually nothing is way beyond my simple mind's comprehension.
"Are the players better as the stakes go up? It's not an exam; it's a buyin." Barry Tanenbaum