by iceman5 » Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:41 pm
"Say you have hemophilia. Someone shoots you with a .45 and you die of blood loss when the doctors can't stop the bleeding. Does the guy not face murder charges just because you had hemophilia?"
If the actual shooting itself was leagl, no the person wouldnt face any charges. If I shoot a burglar in my house and he dies because hes a hemopheliac, then I sure hate it for him.. he shouldve stayed out of my house. If I shoot a guy in a bar fight, and he dies for any reason including some preexisting condition, then yeah, Im screwed.
In other words, if the cop tazes someone legally which 99% of them are, then the cop is not introuble at all if the guy dies. The idiot shouldve thought abotu what could happen to his enlarged heart before he started doing whatever he was doing to get tazed.
There has NEVER been a case where it was proven that a tazer killed anyone. Theyve been tested beyond belief. No medical examiner in this country has ever ruled a death was caused by a tazer and they are the final authority on this. A tazer has been ruled as a contributing factor in deaths, but so has alot of other techniques that police use.
K3nt, the level of your liberalism never ceases does it? Dont do anything to get tazed and you wont have to worry about the tazer killing you. Its very simple. When a guy is swinging a knife at my partner should I ask him about his medical history before tazing him? Ive already said that the tazing in this case looks excessive to me from the limited info I have and without having been there..
iceman5
![The Ace of Spades [As]](https://www.pofex.com/images/smilies/As.gif)