by JDLush » Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:00 am
The book is a must read IMO, and it answers all the questions above.
He's a heads up specialist, and wanted to play huge stakes to put more pressure on the pros. He knew they had an edge of course, and the stakes were one way of him trying to gain some of that edge back.
Beal is down overall to the 'corporation', but not by all that much considering the number of hands and how many BBs we're talking about. He schooled quite a few of the top players as well, including Greenstein, Hansen, Giang, and Chan. Lederer, Harman and Brunson (Todd) all did the best against him if I remember correctly. He is definitely not a sucker, by any stretch of the imagination.