If you have the best hand then being aggressive might cause the other player(s) to fold.
If you do not have the best hand then being aggressive causes you to lose more than you should if they do fold.
How do you balance this if you don't know if you have the best hand or not?
The average winning hand in Hold'em is 2 pair. So, be aggressive with 2-pair hands and better only? Be more passive with TPTK or overpair?
Any ideas or comments?
I make a continuation bet about 75% of the time whether I hit or miss. e.g. I seldom check the flop when I raised pre-flop or called a raise pre-flop and am first to act.
Is this too aggressive?
I got pushed off the best hand this morning. I had TT mp first in and raised. Three saw the flop of
. I made my usually continuation bet $2 into a $3.25 pot and got raised to $7 by the next player to act. The BB called and I folded (actually I was getting 4:1 on my money and a call would not have been that bad). The Turn was my
- I know I should have folded here but my point is that they were both on flush draws. The raiser had
and the BB had
- Raiser won with pair of 7's.
I had the boss hand all the way as long as a heart did not hit. I did not know it but I had a 34% to win.
His very aggressive raise won him the pot along with my very poor flop bet. I check and he bets, BB calls then I might call thinking that they were on a flush draw. But, hard to say. Folding is probably the best play?
Damn, this game gets harder the more I play it.
[9s]