I figure my weakest spot in NL at this point is shorthanded, so I've started playing the 6-max $25 tables on Stars just to get a feel for it. While I know that aggression is the key here, these guys don't seem to have very much control at all and just think raising and betting almost randomly is the way to win. So, I've been playing fairly tight, up a bit but not enough hands to really say much.
Anyhow, I don't really have much of a "strategy" here, and that makes me rather uncomfortable. So, here are some thoughts.
First, in comparison to a full table, one has simply chopped off the first three positions. So, I figure my normal "MP playable" hands are playable UTG and UTG+1. That's all suited connectors, all pairs, unsuited big cards J or better, suited big cards T or better. This is a very tight hand selection in comparison to the rest of the table as a rule, but I think it's not too bad with a table playing ridiculously loose.
Then there's the question of raise or not. I'm really inclined to limp on all of these (from 54s to AA) as long as the rest of the table is so raise-crazy. I see almost no fold equity here (thins the field a little, but the continuation bet is almost pointless).
Where I see raising a lot is LP, however (essentially on all of these hands). They'll always call, and then something like a 1/2 pot continuation bet seems reasonable if checked to.
By 6-max standards that's not really many hands, but it seems to me pretty decent at hopelessly loose tables.
I think the real switch up would be raising any ace from any position, but I think it presupposes some reasonable fold equity (ideally on the flop) on the part of the rest of the table.
Opinions?