I guess I should've bet the full pot on the flop here to see if my queens were good or whether the other players' resolves would leave them, but I didn't. And that is probably why I got punished.

What's your guess on UTG+1's hand? 99? Ah9h? I obviously don't know..

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed)

saw flop|saw showdown

SB ($109.10)
BB ($118.75)
UTG ($86.65)
UTG+1 ($94.10)
Hero ($98.50)
MP2 ($104.80)
MP3 ($29)
CO ($58.45)
Button ($56.55)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with , .
UTG calls $1, UTG+1 calls $1, Hero raises to $5, 6 folds, UTG calls $4, UTG+1 calls $4.

Flop: ($16.50) , , (3 players)
UTG bets $2, UTG+1 calls $2, Hero raises to $8, UTG calls $6, UTG+1 calls $6.

Turn: ($40.50) (3 players)
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $30, UTG folds, UTG+1 raises to $81.1, Hero folds.

Final Pot: $151.60

Results in white below:
No showdown. UTG+1 wins $151.60.

A9 seems like the logical hand.

After your raise gets called on the flop you might as well dump this hand. There are no real draws, he's got an Ace with a weak kicker and there's no way you're getting him to fold. I do this same thing all the time, overplaying my KK/QQ after an Ace flops and it's a huge leak. Yes they're muppets for calling raises with Ax but that doesn't justify us paying them off... now if I could only follow my own advice...

To continue with the hand, I raise more on the flop and then check the turn if called. No need to waste that $30. He either has an ace he is unlikely to dump, a set which he is trapping or is a muppet and might let you get to showdown free.