Good play or bad play on my part?

He makes a mini-raise to $4, I re-raised and he calls. It does not look to me like he has AA or KK.

On party poker he would have flopped a flush. Why all in on the Jack? trap with the nuts?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (9 handed)

BB ($195)
UTG ($160.55)
UTG+1 ($47)
MP1 ($198)
MP2 ($52.80)
MP3 ($368.25)
Hero ($80.15)
Button ($97)
SB ($172.85)

Preflop: Hero is CO with , .
3 folds, MP2 raises to $4, 1 fold, Hero raises to $10, 3 folds, MP2 calls $6.

Flop: ($23) , , (2 players)
MP2 bets $10, Hero calls $10.

Turn: ($43) (2 players)
MP2 bets $32.8 (All-In), Hero calls $32.80.

River: ($108.60) (2 players, 1 all-in)

Final Pot: $108.60

Results in white below:
MP2 has 6s 2s (high card, king).
Hero has Ac Kh (one pair, kings).
Outcome: Hero wins $108.60.

Hands like this are why I have trouble laying down KK/AA or other big hands. Half the time the douche betting/raising will have a bag of chode, the other half they will have a set/other made hand.

That might be the worst play Ive ever seen. A check raise all in on the flop might work, but thats idiotic.

Oh yeah...reraise to more than $10 next time.

I don't mind taking the passive line against the blufftastic that can have any two and they will shovle it in with beat hands, I think that might be the best line as if you raise they often fold.

I don't even mind making it 10 to the min raise here. Against more normal opposition it should be 14, but against this guy that should serve as big enough raise to isolate him. The rest of the table has to respect the weak raise, real re-raise, as a potential spot that can create stacking off preflop.

Did you have a read on this guy? I think this is a situational hand. And why on party would he flop a flush?