by k3nt » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:59 pm
Beavis, that math makes no sense at all and I have no clue what you're trying to say.
I get $90 = 90% of $100.
But what on earth is that $65 figure?? What are you saying? No matter what I do to try to figure out your thoughts, I can't get anything to come out to $65.
...........
Let's say you have the following goal: I want to retire when I reach $X in the bank (say $1 million, or $2 million, or whatever). That's enough cash, you say to yourself, to keep up a lifetyle that I will enjoy and never have to worry about money again.
If that's your goal (and it seems pretty realistic -- a lot of people have similar goals), then every time your taxes are increased, you would work more. You'd either work longer hours, or more years, or whatever, but you would work more, in order to reach your retirement goal.
Alternatively, let's say that your goal in life is to have a house just a little bit bigger, and vacations just a little bit nicer, and a car a little bit newer, than your siblings / parents / former frat brothers / drinking buddies / whoever. You're all in this semi-declared competition together. If that's your most important motivation to make money (and again, for a lot of people it is), then increasing income tax rates will have no effect on how much you work. Everybody in your group will be equally affected by tax policy, whatever that policy may be.
I understand not liking taxes ... and I understand that Economics 101 says that anytime you tax something you get less of it ... but it seems like basic human nature may resist the conclusion that more taxes on work necessarily leads to less work.\
.....
Note, I'm not saying anything against any particular "fair tax" scheme. For a variety of reasons I'm not exactly a huge fan of the current tax structure, either!