$0.05/$0.1 Blinds No Limit Hold'em - *** 06 25 15:45:09 2007
Table Caffe Tabac (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button


Total number of players : 6
Seat 3: hoppiti ( $9.17 )
Seat 4: IXanthos ( $9.13 )
Seat 5: btfpunk ( $14.19 )
Seat 6: engizz ( $10.67 )
Seat 7: DimonM ( $5.65 )
Seat 8: HERO( $9.5 )


btfpunk posts small blind [$0.05].
engizz posts big blind [$0.1].


** Dealing down cards **

Dealt to HERO
DimonM calls [$0.1].
HERO raises [$0.4].
hoppiti folds.
IXanthos folds.
btfpunk calls [$0.35].
engizz folds.
DimonM calls [$0.3].


** Dealing Flop **

btfpunk bets [$0.7].
DimonM calls [$0.7].
HERO raises [$2.59].
btfpunk calls [$1.89].
DimonM calls [$1.89].


** Dealing Turn **
btfpunk bets [$11.2].
DimonM calls [$2.66].
HERO ????

It's quite clear I'm beat by a retard who just hit his straight or flush but who calls here to try and boat up and take down a relatively huge pot?

Do I have the odds to call here?

What about the reverse implied odds of someone hitting the straight flush??

Mathmatician please!!

Cheers Stoney.

I get basic pot odds theory of course. I folded. Was just wondering if I had perhaps the implied odds to resuck on the two villians.

One showed for the turned straight, the other called an all in with

River was and made villian number two a higher flush. Ironic that they both needed each others cards to make the straight flush that they clearly got so excited about trying to make.

So neither had a made hand on the flop, yet called a massive bet in relation to the pot and drew out on me. Sigh.

I made a note of them both anyway.

You had exactly *zero* of the 'implied' odds. If the bet wasn't all-in for you on the turn, you would have had 'implied' odds.