HOLY S**T!!!!!!!!

by **AlexMR** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:45 am

http://www.pokerhand.org/?949611

If he had hit that [Td]

that would've been tite...3K BBJ and all but quad 9s dont qualify.

by **black_knight6** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:03 am

Are you shitting me? Quad TTTT is the minimum? WEAK!!!

by **AlexMR** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:46 am

No, man, quad Jacks is the minimum. GAY.

by **MTPaid** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:34 pm

Do you actually pay rake on a BBJ that doesn't pay out to quad 9's? Those online BBJ's are so ridiculous. It should be paid out by how far ahead someone is on the flop, not by what hand they have.

I mean if you have [9d]

x on a

[Qd][Kd] board, action is nuts and you get it all vs [Ad]

[8d]. in the turn is [Td]

do you really deserve a bad beat jackpot? Bad beats are flopped sets getting all-in and being rivered by a 3rd King on the river vs KK. That's where they should pay out, but that shit happens wayyyyyy to often and the poker sites couldn't afford it.

by **AlexMR** » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:26 am

yeah. Quad Jacks dont lose very often. The thing is that the creyptos dont take any more rake for the BBJ. It s like B2b and cant remember what other network, not like party or prima here you have to pay additional rake for the BBJ. Nice thing to have I guess. I was datamining the other day and saw a str8flush losing to a higher str8 fush. The second time i see that. Crazy.