by excession » Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:03 pm
Sigh. OK firstly:
Mexico - Spanish colony
Sierra Leone - British colony
Sudan - British colony
Philiipenes - Spanish colony
Congo - Belgian colony
Vietnam - French colony
Iraq - Ottoman then British colony (now US)
Nicaragua - effectively a US colony throughout 20th Century (they sponsored the Sonoza family dictatorship) and before that fought over and/or controlled by Spain, Mexico and US
These 'inferior races' were colonised and exploited by racist masters for hundreds of years. Some would say that economically this exploitatiion contin ues to this day.
Secondly modern genetics has shown most of the concept of 'race' to be absolute bollocks. Take two random Africans - they will be more genetic distance between them than between any two people chosen from anywhere else on the planet. With the exception of some very specific and usually localised genetic factors, culture is the unit of human division, not 'race'.
Thirdly - Ice - please read Guns Germs and Steel before you post on why whites have higher standards of living. The real reasons might surprise you.
Ps. I would assume that if black people are better at sports it's because physically weak blacks haven't been able to survive, be it on slave ships, plantages or in the bush.
Shamefully in the US there was also another process of selection other than natural at work - the slave owners 'bred' the slaves like horses and dogs (when they weren't passing on their own genes through the female slaves of course).
I have seen studies that suggest African Americans have more fast twitch muscle and so make better sprinters - but of course Black Africans are renowned for long distance running not sprinting which suggests that the difference isn't deep-rootedly racial as cultural. Notice how with the US African American athletes finding money easier to make in other sports it's white Russians who now hold the world heavyweight titles for example.
Last edited by
excession on Sun Nov 12, 2006 2:18 pm, edited 3 times in total.