Ok, you guys know I have an opinion on this stuff, so here goes.
First, I knew Clinton about a thousand years ago, when we were all much younger. I loved the guy and was totally disappointed at his getting caught. That's right, getting caught. Powerful men have always had this kind of thing on the side. Psychologists say the drives of ambition and sex are closely related. Even the dullest old stick there ever was, Dwight Eisenhower, had a mistress. The problem was Clinton got caught. After 6 years of constant investigation, he gave the Republicans the ammunition to ruin what should have been a sterling presidency. (That's not really fair because it was only a small faction of the Republican party that was out to get him. It's just the same small faction that has been in power for the past 6 years.)
Comparing Clinton and Foley is absurd. Clinton was a driven heterosexual man who loved women, all women, and loves getting laid, as I assume all of you here do as well. Foley has a compulsion for young boys. One is a pedophile and one is a horndog, just like me. If you think the two are the same, you're past being an idiot. That level is beyond your comprehension, and all can see through your rhetoric. After six years, Clinton-bashing is still the only thing the Republicans have going for them. What a sorry bunch of losers.
"So he lied about sex. People lie DURING sex!" Jerry Seinfeld
Clinton lied about having sex. (He had sex with Markie Post, too, but we don't mind that at all.) Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction. Clinton embarrassed us. Bush has cost us 50,000 casualties--KIA and wounded--and hundreds of thousands of dead Iraquis and Afghanis. Which lie would you say was the worst?
"Are the players better as the stakes go up? It's not an exam; it's a buyin." Barry Tanenbaum