about a month ago..i made the move from $20NL to $50NL. i play almost entirely @ Prima.

my $20NL stats over 15k hands were 19% VP$IP, 7%PFR, 22% WtSD, 58% W$SD and 18ptbb/100

my $50NL stats over 7.5k hands: 20% VP$SIP, 6%PFR. 19%WtSD. but only 46% W$SD and only 7ptbb/100.

i've spent a significant amount of time trying to analyze any newly developed leaks in my game...but i honestly think that i'm playing *better* now than i have been in the past couple months.

could it just be that im taking more bad beats than normal? i know 7.5k isn't a large enough sample size for everything to even out, and the beats certainly seem more frequent than usual (though i could just be imagining that).

could the $20NL games be THAT much easier? if so..i should probably stay there...i make roughly the same amount of $$$/100 hands, there's less risk and less rake.

was i just on a really long lucky streak at $20NL?

is there some anomaly about the $50NL at prima? i dont get it. i feel like i should be winning more than i am...and i can't for the life of me figure out why.

jon

I saw someone say this the other day in a similiar post, but have a look at your 10 biggest losing hands and see if they were due to bad beats or bad plays. If they were because of poor play, then you can fix the leaks. If they were bad beats, then just try and get a bigger sample size and re-evaluate when you have that. I don't think 7.5K is enough to get an accurace depiction IMO.