Some history before this hand. I was playing rather loose, raising 78s UTG, and 56o OTB and all stuff like this. Postflop I raised a lot of probe bets , doubled barreled sometimes, so my image is Lagish.

Opponent seems rather solid, but I am seating 2nd to his left, so probably I've raised him out of a couple of pots.

Button has 200, I cover by much..

Preflop:

I post BB, and have , MP limps, Button raises to 8, I reraise to 24, folds to Button who calls after thinking for about 10sec.

Flop: (pot 50)
I lead 30, he raises to 80...
I?
Thanks for any input. Playing different?


In the hand I reraised to 150 he pushed, here I thought that I was beaten but I had to call 50 into 400 pot, so I decided that it is a call even if I hope only on sucking out.


P.S. I am not sure if this hand is easy to analyse, but it gave me the most doubt after the session.

Reraising from 80 to 150 seems too small. Especially if you're going to call the extra 50 on the 4 bet rereraise all in.

I'm not sure why you think KQ isn't in his range of hands to raise on the button, barring a read (the fact you have QQ notwithstanding)

Anyone else like a check on this flop? Makes it easier with the stacks being what they are and you're either way ahead or way behind anyway. I think it defines his hand more too.

Lee

Seems like he could easily easily have AK here or figured he'd trap with AA even. It's possible he could simply be trying to outplay you here, but since we know he pushed for just $50 more to you, it seems extremely unlikely he is behind here unless he is Donk-3000. Like someone else here said I think AK could easily sit and think about it. Most players simply don't play solid-aggressively enough to go around reraising with AQs or 99. The only reason I often find myself in reraised pots with AK is: I am either the reraiser or the reraiser only raised the minimum. He easily could have called the reraise with AK and making a small CALL ME raise on the flop.