Over at BoDog at a crazy 200NL table (like 45% flop seen, Ave pot = $50+)

No real read on the villain, but he is the other big stack, so this hand could potentially have 400BBs in it. I've been playing dumb in the chat, asking about pot odds, and telling people I am looking up poker terms on google as I hear them in the chat. But I have almost a double stack, so I doubt people believe me that I am donk.

I have $369 UTG
Villain has $436 in the CO

I get dealt and I limp. 2 more limpers, plus the Blinds call, so 5 to the flop ($10 pot)

Flop is

Blinds check, and I bet $7. Only villain calls. Pot = $24

Turn is giving me the 3rd nuts (Behind Pocket Queens and Pocket 5's)

I lead out with a $15 bet. Villain Min-raises me to $30

I decide to just call here. pot = $84

River is the

I decide to lead out, instead of check-raise. I'm not sure if this was the right play. He did min-raise me on the turn, so he probably would bet, but I wanted to make sure I got some more money in on the river.

So I led out on the river with a $45 bet. He raises again to $100, which is pretty much a min bet again.

The only hands that beat me are pocket Qs and 5's. Q's would have raised PF. And I highly doubt he has 5's. Ya can't be afraid of monsters under the bed.

So I re-raise all-in, which means there is $514 in the pot, and he needs to call $230 more.

He ended folding.

So my question is, should I have re-raised something smaller? like re-raise to $180-200? I have no idea what he had, but he obviously didn't have me beat.

In the chat afterwords, he said that he should of called, cause he thought that he had me beat. I then told him I had the 3rd nuts, and he said, oh, I guess I would have lost.

So I'm thinking maybe A5s or something like that.

Thanks