Party NL100.
I'm in SB ($95), opponent is BB ($90)
Me:
It folds all the way around to me, I call the .50 cents. BB min-raises to $2. I thought that this was interesting so I look at his stats. 11% VP$IP, 4% PFR, pretty tight, I'm thinking there is a good chance this guy has aces and is smart enough to realize that checking would be stupid but not smart enough to realize that min-raising is just as bad. I call.
Flop:
I check, he I believe had the insta-check on because it immediately checks through. At this point, I have an overwhelming feeling that he does in fact have aces and just made top set.
Turn:
I check, insta checks again.
River:
Great, I finally made a hand, now what do I do. Well, I could check, and he would certainly bet and then I could raise, but I feel like this gives him too much of a way to get away from the hand, or get out cheap. Or I could overbet the pot, trying to make it look like a steal or a semi-weak hand after we've gone check/check twice. So I bet $10 into the $2 pot. He thinks about it for a minute and min-raises to $20, alright it's settled. He's got the aces. Now I figure this guy is either going to take top set all the ay with multiple straights/flushes on board or he's not, so I don't feel like re-raising to $40 would really be a smart play, so after about 3 seconds, I move all in, he calls immediately, shows the aces.
I felt really great about this hand, and it turned a losing session into a winning one. I'm just curious to know, anyone play that river differently? I mean of course the ultimate goal is to get all the money in if you think you've got the best hand, which I did, but I just wanted to know if there are alternate opinions.