I'm curious, since virtually all internet games use the same .05 per $1 to the rake, who is a better than even money player to the house long term?

I'm thinking long term, your wins minus your losses in the game, while you can show a profit, the house shows just as much profit as you. At least this has been my experience at less than .50/1 $100 NL. Not saying you are losing, just the house wins as much as you.

I don't have my $50 .25/.50 PT up on this machine so I can't immediately give my numbers, but last time I checked I remember being even to the rake as a decent winner in PTBB/100 at something over 10 and under 15. When I get that hard drive fired up again I will give my hard numbers.

I think there can be a real argument for moving to $100 or $200 NL ASAP and leaving the $50 in the dust ASAP, in the long term rake to pot ratio. I'm only basing it on my own experiences so I can't tell if it is just my micro play or a bigger trend.

Not to hijack, but that is why I'm spending time at 25nl i have the roll for 50NL but the pots seem bigger at 25NL sometimes and are alot softer. Not saying 50nl is head and shoulders above 25nl but I may attempt to skip 50nl all together. Let me know how it goes alex