$200NL 6-max @ FT

first 2 players limp, i limp [3d] in the CO. SB completes. 5 to the flop. SB is kinda weak/bad and BB seems the same though i dont have significant history on him.

flop: [4h][2h]
pot: $10

SB bets $8. BB calls. folds to me, i call.

turn:
pot: $34

SB bets $8 again. BB calls, i call.

river:
pot: $56

checks to me. do we fire here?

PF- i fold sometimes but limp behind other limpers sometimes too. that's just part of how i roll.

flop raise- i agree its an option but i felt that SB leading into a field of 4 opponents showed some strength.

turn- i agree that there's no chance anyone has a set. i should probably have raised this turn and repped the set. i actually agree w/ your thinking here pretty strongly. BUT my main concern at the time was that i'd have to follow through on the river because flush draws may call a turn raise.

also- if BB has a flush draw, he's drawing to the hearts 'cause there's almost no way he sees a turn with a backdoor draw. i also tend to think he don't have a flush once he checks the river.

I wouldn't bluff here but I think its a reasonable spot for it.

That said, I really like a raise on the flop or turn. Especially the turn after they look so weak.

My bad about the flush draw (different shapes, same colors, gets confusing). I agree with everything you said in your last post, though I still think betting the river into two players when people do stupid stuff stuff isn't profitable.

I like the bluff here against 2 weakish players. I can see them giving up TP quite readily.