No, I lost about $50 playing top two pair and an inside straight draw lol. I was on the button, and had AKJT suited to the ace. A few limpers to me, and I raised it up (this is $100PLO so I think I raised to about $5). There were 4 callers. Flop came KJ5 rainbow. SB checked, UTG bet about $8 into a $25+ pot. This usually suggests a draw, so at this point I have him very solidly on something like ATQ; this tends to be right a vast amount of the time at Stars, the players are pretty passive and also quite predictable, this player certainly had been weak leading draws and non-nut hands for some time so I was 95% sure he had a draw. As I have several of the drawing outs covered (one T, one A and the Q gives me the nuts with a redraw) and as two of the other 3 players passed when the bet came to me, I decided I could get most of this player's stack in (he had something like $60 at the start of the hand) so I made the maximum re-raise. As it comes back to him he puts his remaining $10 or 15 or so into the pot, I call and he has KK. I don't find my Q and he rakes the pot. It may have been closer to $140 in fact but I think I only lost about $60 on it.
In my opinion this game is very situational. It is certainly fine to suggest that losing a big pot on a hand as weak as two pair is bad in omaha, but to some extent it could be a bit lazy to do so... I think I make a lot of my money on this game by being able to read the betting patterns of online players in the fairly straightforward games I play and making the right decision. If he had a draw here, as I was 95% sure he did, I'm a fairly significant money favourite. It does indeed look a little maniacal to make plays like this, but I stand by it because I make a lot of money with this style and the odd setback, whilst frustrating, is par for the course when you're trying to push fairly marginal edges and judgement calls.
Anyways, thats my take on it

flame at will
Monk
xxxxx